Quell Firestop
The labelling on the product does not comply with the mandatory standard for portable aerosol fire extinguishers . The product may be mistaken for a fire extinguisher when it is a fire suppressant.
19 archived Australian notices, each linked to its official Product Safety Australia source. The page updates automatically when new notices arrive.
The labelling on the product does not comply with the mandatory standard for portable aerosol fire extinguishers . The product may be mistaken for a fire extinguisher when it is a fire suppressant.
Due to a manufacturing defect the needle-stick resistant material may have been installed incorrectly. If the needle-stick resistant material is not installed correctly, the glove will not provide the certified level of protection.
The product has a delayed response time for triggering the alarm. It does not meet the EN 50291-1:2018 standard for the response time of carbon monoxide alarms.
Affected earmuffs may crack on the exterior surface of the cups and reduce the hearing protection effectiveness.
The earmuff headband force decreases over time when the P5E attachment arm is used in combination with certain hard hats. This could lead to the earmuffs offering less protection and more sound than intended to leak around the seal of the earmuff.
This product does not comply with the requirements of the AS/NZS 3504:2006 Fire blankets standard. The fire blanket may fail to control or extinguish a fire.
Some Draeger particle filters used in the combination respiratory protection filters do not provide the required particle filtration efficiency. The toxic gas filtration efficiency of the activated carbon is not affected.
The cartridges may not provide adequate levels of protection against harmful particulates.
The gloves may contain high levels of polycyclic-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).
Due to the lack of full adhesive application, the nose foam may separate from the top panel of the respirator and detach or move during use.
In some products a yellow protective cap may have been left on one of the two smoke sensors during the manufacturing process.
The fire extinguishers can become clogged or require excessive force to discharge and may fail to activate during a fire emergency. In addition, the nozzle can detach with enough force to pose an impact hazard.
It has been determined that a small percentage of Workman 9.0 m & 15.0 m SRLs may have an improper brake nut tongue setting.
Certain visors may not comply with mandatory high velocity impact performance requirements.
Due to the absence of safety labeling and the fire extinguishers not being coloured red as required by the mandatory standard, AS/NZS 1841.1:1997, the extinguishers fail to meet the requirements of Consumer Product Safety Standard No. 9 of 2004.
The product may not provide impact resistance due to sporadic temple (arm) breakage issues.
Due to a microprocessor malfunction, the EPIRB may fail the self test procedure.
Under certain circumstances, the chest buckles may experience slippage.
The bound loop prusiks may not conform to Sterling Rope quality standards and may break at a lower load than the published values.